As spotlighted, the natural gift economy is expected to receive the gift or gift giving something in return, as governmental support, military services, commitment or other gifts and favors. This was standard in warrior orders where kings and generals given off freely to their subsidiaries waiting to shift their loyal service. In these organizations were social laws that penalized those who did not give anything in return. The punishment usually consisted of stop giving gifts to the jealous, but the punishment could also include a bad reputation, be released from the challenge to a duel or public ridicule.

Lewis Hyde names the spirit of the gift economy, as matched to a commercialized economy, saying that what we should be passed to his time or something that is precious the same has to follow the path. The gift giver can be given to the original, but this is not the most important. The only essential thing is that the gift must always move.The emphasis that the traditional gift economy is based on the responsibility to give, accept the obligation and the obligation to reciprocate, and this is both economic, legal, intellectual, artistic, religious and mythological.

It's easy to fantasize about the idea of the gift economy, people do not always like entangled in a web of obligations. Marcel Mauss wrote: "The gift not cut back to one who takes it," .

Another problem with the economies of the gift is the beginning. In historic gift economies, the giver gets the property from looting and pillage. The need to give gifts can make to society and leave bellicose little opportunity for those leaders more peaceful. The capitalist system and economy also other structures are constructed by abusers and skinned isolated from the rest. These symptoms seem the result of human greed, more to come from a particular form of organization.

In a true empowered economy is oftentimes the case that the shift of gifts takes position between more than than two people. A narrative of two women said that Kashmir Brahman tried to fulfill their obligations of charity presenting gifts to each other. When they died, became poisoned two seeds from which no one could drink, reflecting the futility of this sham of a present.

This thought of expanding the circle is seen in societies where hunters are animals to the priests, the gift to the gods, which is supposed to return abundant game. Hunters do not sacrifice them directly.



There are examples of present economies in today's global economy. The blood banks exist in numerous states do not give an explicit reward for donations. Families of organ donors don't receive any compensation for the donation. In fact, someone charged for organs is regarded as a suspect, could even be a crime.


.
แสดงความคิดเห็น   เพิ่มลิงก์นี้ที่...  เผาซะ

ความคิดเห็น ใครโหวตบ้าง เรื่องที่เกี่ยวข้อง
มาทำความเข้าใจกันก่อน outline | เว็ปแห่งนี้คือการเป็นคนกลางระหว่างเขาและเธอ ฮา ใครมีเรื่องเด็ดๆ มาแบ่งปันกันอย่าได้หมกเม็ด เพื่อให้เพื่อนๆได้อ่านเรื่องราวดีๆของเว็ปคุณหรือเรื่องที่ท่านสนใจมารวมไว้ที่นี่ เป็นtrendใหม่แห่งปี2009 อีกทั้งเป็นช่องทาง โปรโมทเว็บฟรีๆที่ได้ลิงก์แบบ DoFollow ช่วยเพิ่มจำนวนผู้ชมเว็บเป็นเท่าตัว บอทแรงกระจาย ไม่อยากตกtrend มาdiggกันครับ